|
Hi all, I was at the Systemideveloper.com conference last week and was able to attend George Farr's keynote address. In the address there were a boatload of comments made by him that I plan on mulling over in the next few months, but one in particular that I thought was interesting was the approach getting money to continue WDSC development. In the end we all know that the developers on the WDSC product line don't work for free, and the more burden they are to IBM the less throughput we will get from them (read they won't be able to hire and expand as much as they would like). In an effort to address this George stated they are looking to have customers pay for certain features. For example if you wanted the new screen designer you will be charged $300/seat for that feature. Note that is a "pretend" number that simply gives example to where George foresee's the pricing structure vs. the $4K numbers we were hearing about the AE purchase. Looking at it from the big picture I'd say that they are right on the mark in charging for solid tooling. If I can get second to none tooling, which I believe they are capable of, that gives me the competitive edge; then I am willing to dish out the cash. The burden will fall on them though to make a creative pricing structure that doesn't paint them into a corner - the opposite corner of their customers. What I mean by that is there are a wide variety of shops out there with varying environments. What about the shops that have very few developers or zero tooling budget? You don't simply want high paying customers using your product, because widespread adoption has nearly as much benefit as getting money - hard to have one without the other in today's tooling market. I would love to see them go with a model that gives the first 3 to 5 licenses of WDSC to shops COMPLETELY FREE. That would make it so small shops wouldn't be paying the expense and larger shops would be able to have their R&D teams fully test the features to ensure they wanted to make the purchase, or simply let the few that need to tool have it at a reasonable price. The other option of course would be to simply have site/machine licenses similar to how we have the compilers. Maybe instead of going with a per seat license the simply charge $4K for a single machine which would be attractive for shops with more than 14 developers. In the end our WANT to pay IBM money for features totally depends on us seeing things that will save us time/money in the long run. George made it very clear in his address that we "..will not be disappointed". We shall have to see what comes out of big blue in the next two years. BTW, I am installing my COMPLETELY FREE WDSC 7.0 as I type this:-) On last note I wonder if they will query customers to see what they are willing to pay in an effort to be in check with what the market will bear. Thoughts? Aaron Bartell http://mowyourlawn.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.