|
Mike, As promised a update.... We think to have gotten to a maximal reasonable setting. This means that overall performance for Webfacing Users is acceptable as long we do not things extra (not logging to much, no admin console running during office hours, and so on). Since this is a fragile equilibrium we have advised our client to add more RAM to his configuration. They will add 2 Gb of RAM and we will evaluate the results when things are running with it. With all the investigations that have being done we have not found a way to keep track on the GC information automatically. Within WAS Admin Console you can select to collect this information but in the monitor it self the info does not appear. This info seems not to be available when on JDK 1.4 Anyone knows of alternatives.... Kind regards, Eduard. ----- Original Message ---- From: "eduard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <eduard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2007 10:22:41 AM Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] WAS / WebFacing performance?? Mike, We have done some tuning to trigger GC more often by adjusting the Initial HeapSize of the WAS instance running the Application. The default was 96Mb and brought it back to 40Mb on this 1CPU 1GB ram 520 machine. This has brought back the time used for GC from 80 to 500 seconds to 2 to 30 seconds. This has also improved the performance perception of the users using the webfaced application considerably. The GC times gathered we have done with DMPJVM because we could not find an appropiate way to do this in an automated way. To know how would really help because we then can plot the time and moments used for GC with the results on the PMI performance we have found we can do within the WAS server. We have activated this PMI functionality to get a view of the actual action performance (do action, what time did it cost to complete action). As we understand now we can only get this information on a running base. That is nice, but much nicer is as we can get this over a time. We than could see the effect of the changes applied and can easier figure out what is the most ideal value in the given setting. I must assume these possibilities exist, just have not stumbled on. I have people working on this, if anyone knows how or where to look, please let me know. Keep you all informed. Eduard. ----- Original Message ---- From: Mike Hockings <hockings@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:25:51 PM Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] WAS / WebFacing performance?? Hi Eduard, I can appreciate how you feel ;-) I am sure the performance can be improved, from what I understand of it you really want the GC to run more often but with less to do each time. In any case here are a couple of things that I have found which could help your quest... I (and others too, I am sure) would be most interested to hear how it turns out. Mike WebSphere tuning for the impatient: How to get 80% of the performance improvement with 20% of the effort http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0602_lurie/0602_lurie.html Tuning garbage collection for Java and WebSphere running classic JVM on i5/OS http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/enable/site/education/wp/c566/index.html Mike Hockings, P.Eng. WebSphere Development Tools for AS/400 - CODE/Designer & WebFacing ! IBM Canada Ltd. Laboratory hockings@xxxxxxxxxx voice 905 413 3199 eduard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent by: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 02/16/2007 12:57 PM Please respond to Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject Re: [WDSCI-L] WAS / Webfacing performance?? Mike, When it happens all the users are slow. We also see excessive non DB paging in the *BASE pool (over the thousandth for as well the Faults as the Pages) whilst no considerable CPU is used. We have tried the stop and refresh the browser, that does not seem to have a effect. I guess the above boils down to the GC assumption. I'm trying to learn about how to control that (I do understand the concepts for GC but poor native iSeries bastards like me never had to worry about these kind of things, but 'progress' has reached us) but could not get straight answers. Hope some knows more than I do and can help. Kind regards, Eduard, ----- Original Message ---- From: Mike Hockings <hockings@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:02:09 PM Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] WAS / Webfacing performance?? Does the slowdown happen for only the single user or for all users ? If it is for all users then I would suspect something like the GC but if it is for a single user then I would suspect browser settings or communications somehow. When you see it something you might try is hitting stop then refresh on the browser and see if that makes it pick up the pace a bit. I have also heard, indirectly, that some of this type of performance problems can be related to routers in the intranet needing to be rebooted or needing a firmware update. But I will quickly add that I myself don't know how to make that sort of determination. It would seem to me that if the performance is ok before and after the "slowness" that the memory you have should be sufficient. Mike Mike Hockings, P.Eng. WebSphere Development Tools for AS/400 - CODE/Designer & WebFacing ! IBM Canada Ltd. Laboratory hockings@xxxxxxxxxx voice 905 413 3199 eduard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent by: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 02/15/2007 09:42 AM Please respond to Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject Re: [WDSCI-L] WAS / Webfacing performance?? Thanks Mike and others... Lets start with asuming it is an garbage collection problem..... How can we inflict GarbageCollection more often (so it has less to do). We had already looked at other aspects like network traffic and Browser problems (Just because we did not want to start with pointing at the iSeries or WAS or Webfacing). We could not find reasons in these for what is experienced. Yes, we also where positively surprised with the performance of WAS/Webfacing on a rather slim box. If it turns out that we need more RAM, what would be an reasonable total of RAM to add? We want to be pretty sure upfront that it will bring back the problem to an acceptable level (5 minutes reponse time brought back to 2.5 minutes is a lot but is still not acceptable). Kind regards, Eduard, ----- Original Message ---- From: Mike Hockings <hockings@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:25:28 PM Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] WAS / Webfacing performance?? Hi Eduard, I can think of a couple of things that might cause those symptoms, maybe. First of all I wonder if the starting of a session or the displaying of a new (busy) page may be causing the JVM to initiate garbage collection? I don't know if that would cause a slowdown or not but it might. Possibly getting the GC to run more often (so it has less to do) may alleviate it if this turns out to be the problem? The other thing that I could think of is that it seems sometimes IE doesn't seem to like to play well with WAS. I have never been able to definitely track this down but by setting the IE cache settings to "Automatic" it seems to provide the best results. If you have to "check every page" you can get occasional dismal or worse response times. Mike Mike Hockings, P.Eng. WebSphere Development Tools for AS/400 - CODE/Designer & WebFacing ! IBM Canada Ltd. Laboratory hockings@xxxxxxxxxx Eduard Sluis <eduard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 02/13/2007 03:55 PM Please respond to Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To Midrange Systems Technical iSeries Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, WebSphereGroup Midrange <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject [WDSCI-L] WAS / Webfacing performance?? Dear all, We have Webfaced Applications running under WAS 6.0 running on a 520 Express (1GB RAM). On average the performance is very good (comparable with Green Screen). Sometimes however the performance drops and it takes minutes to get a response. That happens most often when initiating a session. Less common it happens while executing the main (larger) programs (with lots of fields on the screen). There seems no relation with the total of users using the system at that moment. Stopping the session and initiating a new one most often give a normal response time. When it happens we do not see a lot of CPU usage. We do see a lot of Non DB paging. What could be the reason/cause for this? What can be done to get rid if it/get it under control? Kind regards, Eduard.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.