|
From: Bob CozziIf you choose to abandon a tool because it doesn't have one of yourfavorite UI conveniences then that's your prerogative. What are you gonna do, Bob, go back to SEU? No. I would go back to CodeStudio (but I don't want to)--which has some limitations, but its much more Windows-like for editing, it is (imho) vastly superior to the RSE editor, unless you really LOVE SEU and want that interface.
WDSC is better than CodeStudio in every facet, from syntax highlighting to help text to content assist.
For example, how do you delete a line of source? In CodeStudio you press Ctrl+D. I cannot find an equivalent in WDSC.
Again, you don't understand the tool. Mark the line (Shift down arrow) and hit delete, just like in every other Windows editor. And if that's absolutely too much work for you, go to Preferences and bind Ctrl-D to deleteLine in the User Key Actions.
I know I can move over to the SEU seqnbr and enter a D, then press Enter. But I want to go back to green screen SEU every time I have to do that.
So don't do it, Bob. Learn the tool.
Or are you going to just abandon a great product that everybody is usingbecause you can't drag and drop a line? Ah... "everybody" isn't using it. If you find 5,000 users (out of what? 300,000 to 600,000 world-wide) using it, I'd be surprised. "everybody" is subjective.
Let's put it this way: The number is greater every day. You can't say that about CodeStudio, and if we listen to the doomsayers, you can't even say that about SEU and RPG.
No Joe, I want it to work, I want it to be successful. I am planning on being a advocate for it.
Well, when you find the bandwagon is safe enough to hop on, those of us who have been advocating it will welcome you. <smile>
I'm just very surprised that in 2006 a tool as strong as WDSC has many (all?) of the limitations and shortcomings that Editing that CODE/400 had so many years ago.
A lack of understanding on your part is not a limitation on the tool's part.
Some of my experiences are simply a lack of time using RSE
Indeed.
--but that will change, I tend to pick things up quickly.
Okay.
And please don't compare a toy like Notepad that is bundled with a $200 OS to WDSC. Notepad is Windows' "UPDDTA" or SEU. It is not Microsoft Visual Studio. You expect and accept limitations in Notepad and SEU, you don't expect or accept them in the professional development environment.
I have only seen one limitation: You can't drag and drop source. You can cut and paste it, you just can't drag and drop it. Please name another "limitation".
At some point the RPG community has to let go of the SEU/PDM/SDA nipple. But if the replacement offers that same user-interface, you'll only get limited buy-in.
By keeping the SEU commands available, they make it easy for even the most diehard of green screen users to move to the new interface, and then get up to speed with the mouse-based commands at their own pace. This is quite simply the best move IBM has made regarding the GUI. The best.
People that hate green screen editing will move to anything (even Notepad), but the majority will not see a compelling reason to go through a large learning curve only to do exactly what they are already doing, nearly the same way they are doing it, but with lipstick.
That would only be the case if the tool didn't offer the advanced editing features that WDSC offers. WDSC offers both, which in my mind is in keeping with the concept of investment protection that is so key to the System i. In my opinion, a company's most valuable IT asset is its programmers, not its programs. I think making those people as productive as possible by offering a reasonable and defined transition path from the older line-oriented command set to the new mouse-oriented techniques is absolutely brilliant. Remember, I teach this. Nearly every week I teach new students how to use this tool, and out of any 20 people, the Outline view, the search capabilities and the content assist are usually enough to get buy-in from 19 of them. There are a few people who may never make the transition, but you'll find that with any technology. Me, I find the uptake rate to be phenomenal, especially when I start showing them things like Verify and Service Entry Points.
The good news in WDSC 7, to me, is WDSC is a great improvement over the old CODE/400 package. I can load it, edit, close it down, open it back up, and it does all of that very quickly. It also doesn't take long to pull down a member and save it back to the host.
I'm glad you're happy with it, Bob. It's good that someone of your stature in the community is willing to embrace this technology. It's just a little disappointing that you're threatening to throw out the WDSC baby with the drag-and-drop bathwater. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.