|
Hi Bill, Yes, IBM wants the System i community to embrace modernization. This has been a problem for IBM since the S36 refused to die... The perception of the System i as antiquated or "behind the times" gets back to the software that is available for the platform. IBM needs modern software for the platform to entice new customers, and modern software is not easy to develop with stone-age tools like SEU, SDA, RLU, and so forth. You are correct that Java is not an ideal language for business application programming. However, it is extremely robust for middleware, which is used to EXTEND the platform, allowing our HLL applications to be delivered to new interfaces. The new mantra in IT is all about enhancing reusability of business logic through modular deployment architectures like web services or SOA. Old ideas, new techniques and tooling. Java brings the rich environment needed to glue the new parts to the old. What Java lacks in performance and/or resource handling is far exceeded but the richness and extensibility of the environment. Ok, so we have architectures that allow us to write our business logic in RPG for use ANYWHERE we want. Need that product costing routine on that web based order entry? No problem, just run the web services wizard to create the interface. Invoke it from the web app, and your done... What about consuming a web service from your RPG app (Sales tax service, credit card billing, address verification)? Again, you have wizards to build an interface that can be called from your HLL application to access a service. Can you do this in SEU? Probably... Is it productive? Probably not.... JMO, Eric -----Original Message----- From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bill Barnes Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:06 AM To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] WDSCI-L Digest, Vol 5, Issue 174 I'm sorry that you've had so much trouble with WDSC Bill. It seems you've been particularly unlucky - I don't think we've all had quite as many problems. As for the question of your co-workers, I don't think I'll ever understand the "if I use WDSC, I have to use only WDSC" mentality. I still use SEU, PDM, and even the green-screen debugger from time to time. Sometimes it's just the simplest way to get the job done. I don't really see why that's a problem - I like having multiple tools available to work how I see fit. The perception is being pushed by IBM. The impression is that they want everyone off PDM and on RSE. Just like they want everyone to "Migrate to WEBSPHERE". I have not seen any compelling reasons to use WEBSPHERE. JAVA doesn't seem to be an easy language for business. I know it is a resource hog and it seems to run slower than either COBOL or RPG. Visual Basic is simple to use but lacks the robustness of RPG. As for your problem installing the RSE Extensions - what version of WDSC are you running? There was a bug that was fixed sometime after the initial 6.0 release that sometimes caused problems after plugin installation. I am on the absolute latest version prior to the much vaunted V7.0 The version numbers are a tad confusing since I have upgraded 2 or 3 times and get a successful completion but the version numbers don't seem to reflect that. When I do the check for updates thing it says I am cool. HTH, Adam
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.