|
From a project management standpoint wouldn't have been better if IBM
brought out Lite before the Queen Mary. "better" ? Probably - but that is with the benefit of hindsight. Reality is that it wouldn't have happened. The internal justification has to have been not simply to enhance green screen development but to move RPGers forward to the web world. So the JSP/HTML/JavaScript support also had to be there. To achieve that the System i RSE components were built on top of the Application Developer base. To have started from scratch (i.e. the "raw" Eclipse) at that point in history would almost certainly have rendered the project impractical from a cost perspective. Also my understanding is that the early versions of Eclipse supported layered extensions well - which is what we got - but it wasn't so easy just to add mix-and-match componentry. The current version does allow for that and that is why we can expect to see a "real" version of Lite in the next release. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.