Re: WDSC and MS Terminal server

Why not use remote desktop If you only need one connection. I don't have
WDSC installed on my home computer, so I use remote desktop to access my
work computer and use WDSC. Works very well.

Regards

-----Original Message-----
From: Arco Simonse [mailto:arcosimonse@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 4:20 PM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] WDSC and MS Terminal server


   Hi Richard,

   Thanks a lot! I readed the information at the XP Unlimited website. I
   think it's exactly what we need. We have a remote iSeries for which we
   want to set up a WDSC workstation locally at that remote site for use via
   VPN. MS Terminal services was an option to investigate, but is also a
very
   big and expensive hammer for a relative small nail... I'll try XP
   Unlimited, it seems it can do the job with a fraction of the costs for MS
   Server 2003.

   Best regards, Arco Simonse

   >------------------------------
   >
   >message: 5
   >date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 16:22:40 -0600
   >from: richard@xxxxxxxxxxx
   >subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] WDSC and MS Terminal server
   >
   >Each instance will most likely use it's own chunk of memory since each
   >instance starts its own JVM.
   >
   >Keep in mind Windows 2003 Standard Edition only supports up to 4gb of
   >memory.
   >
   >Another option is to set up a shared Windows XP box.
   >
   >Google the web for XP Unlimited which let's you use XP pro as a
   multi-user
   >system.  Cool stuff and less expensive.
   >
--
This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries  (WDSCI-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.