× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



You read too much into things.  A statement of fact isn't necessarily a
complaint.  The only libraries in that list that I care about getting
more recent support are Struts and JSF.  WebSphere ships with Struts
1.1, Struts 1.2.4 (first delivered in 5.1.1) and Struts 1.2.7 (first
delivered in 6.1).  I can't get enough value out of Hibernate (no stored
procedure support) or Spring (will go right over the newbie Java
developer's head).

The point about IBM selecting what to support is to point out that the
bleeding edge is irrelevant.  WDSC sits on the bleeding edge when IBM
wants it to.

Struts 1 may be moving on sheer momentum, but the next-generation Struts
2 codebase (basically they took a better codebase (WebWork) and have
been building Strutsiness into it) is going to be out soon.  The market
has enough room to support action-based and component-based models, and
the leading choices in those models will be Struts and JSF for some time
to come.  There are rumblings on the struts-dev mailing list that they
want to take Struts 2 (when finished) and submit it as the starting
point for a JSR for action-based web frameworks.

-- Robert 

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Joe Pluta
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:57 PM
To: 'Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries'
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Struts

From: Dean, Robert

You keep saying that, but the facts don't bear out what you're
trying to
say.  The "bleeding edge" has no relevence in IBM's technology
selection.

That was in response to your complaint that WDSC doesn't support "
(more
current version of Struts and JSF, Hibernate, Spring, etc)".  Your
words,
not mine.


Struts 1.1 has been supported since WDSC 5 rolled out Struts 1.1
beta
support.  SDO and JSF first appeared in WSAD 5.1, when both were
either
pre-release or fresh off the vine.  The fair thing to say is that
IBM
picks what it wants to support.

As does everybody.  MyEclipse doesn't support Cocoon or Tapestry.
What's
your point?


As far as Struts' relevence, Monster shows more than 1000 job
postings
for
Struts in the last 30 days.  If it's out of date, it's out of date
like
RPG (although RPG only had 348 job postings in the last 30 days) and
not
like OS/2.

Struts is dead, but like Keith Richards it keeps moving on sheer
momentum.
But if you missed it, the Shale announcement was Struts' eulogy.

Joe


--
This is the Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries  (WDSCI-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.