|
> From: Joep Beckeringh > > Not that it is terribly important (with terminals not being made by IBM > anymore), but type-ahead is supported by real terminals. I know of a > developer (the last terminal user in our company) who dislikes > type-ahead so much that he used to change system value QKBDBUF to > *NO, because 'it is confusing for the users', as he argued. Wow! It's been a long time since I tried it, Joep! My old 5250 Model 12 certainly didn't support type-ahead, but I went and checked on my Lynk terminal (I only use dumb terminals for my console) and you're asboslutely right - type-ahead is supported! Thanks for setting the record straight! > P.S.: Thanks for your recent article about WDSC. I had not discovered the > hidden gem WebArt before. Very useful. Thank you kindly. I'm glad to help! Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
