RE: [WDSCI-L] BP says to wait?

[Martin Rowe <martin@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 23:38, Joe Pluta wrote:
> > From: Michael Patton
> > 
> > I hate to come off sounding like a know-it-all, and I'm sure your BP
> has a
> > reason for the recommendation they've made, but in my experience with
> the
> > various versions of WDSC, it can't be a valid reason.
> 
> I have to second this opinion.  WDSCi5.1 is a much faster and more
> stable version of WDSCi.  I still have an occasional lockup, especially
> in the jLpex RPG editor, so I recommend saving your work (with Ctrl-S)
> on a regular basis, but short of that, I think the new version is simply
> head and shoulders above the older version.

How much does it change things if I say WDSCi (advanced) is being used
pretty much exclusively for the WSAD functionality it contains. The
developers will be doing WebSphere bowser based projects (I will too, if
I get the chance) so aren't using the iSeries specific extensions. Other
than a brief play, I don't think any of us has used WDSC for RPG coding
or for system access, so a big improvement on that side isn't as much of
a driver as enhanced WSAD function is.

Regards, Martin  
-- 
martin@xxxxxxxxxx  AIM/Gaim: DBG400dotNet  http://www.dbg400.net       /"\
DBG/400 - DataBase Generation utilities - AS/400 / iSeries Open        \ /
Source free test environment tools and others (file/spool/misc)         X 
[this space for hire]  ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML mail & news  / \