× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. WDSCI-L
  3. October 2003

RE: Weird behaviour of the syntax checker

> From: Anton Gombkötö
> 
> This works really nice in LPEX showing me e.g. RNF0267E and so on.
> That's the way it worked in SEU syntax checking, too. What made me
> think of an strategy is that SEU lost this sort of syntax check in
> /FREE form. OK, i thought, they really want me to use WDSC.
> 
> And now i discover that it is exactly the same!
> 
> Or is there a setting for syntax checks in free form? Then excuse me,
> i wasn't able to find it.

No, Anton, there is no syntax checking in /free, either in SEU or in
WDSC, and as far as I can tell, there are no plans to add it.  The
people who designed /free don't think it's worth adding.  If you
disagree (as I do), then I suggest you make a formal request to IBM.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.