|
#2. For the sake of consistency, you're right, this should be allowed. As for the resequencing option, this needs looking into.
#3. If RSE is used to open a member that has a conflict between the host and the client a message does come up asking whether to "use the cached version or go to the original". If the cached copy hasn't changed since it was last synched with the host version, but the host member has, then the host member should automatically be downloaded to replace the cached version.
____________________________________ David McKnight Phone: 905-413-3902 , T/L: 969-3902 Internet: dmcknigh@xxxxxxxxxx Mail: D1/643/8200/TOR ____________________________________
|---------+------------------------------------------------> | | Vern Hamberg | | | <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | | | Sent by: | | | wdsci-l-bounces+dmcknigh=ca.ibm.com@x| | | idrange.com | | | | | | | | | 02/07/2003 01:55 PM | | | Please respond to Websphere | | | Development Studio Client for iSeries| | | | |---------+------------------------------------------------>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| cc: |
| Subject: RE: [WDSCI-L] Source resequencing? |
| |
| |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Thanks David
Yeah, correct on #2 - now, I do Save as.. to the same file all the time in Windows apps. It even _matters_ in Acrobat. It may not matter in saving to a member, but if that's the only way to get resequencing to work, gotta have it. Besides, it is "normal', to-be-expected, usually, in Windows apps.
AFAICT
CODE allows Save as... over a member, with a confirmation dialog.
CODE has a resequence option in Extras - where'd it go? Will all that be available when REXX macros are brought in? (See George/Phil/Claus' presentation on RPG & COBOL in WDSC.)
On #3, I'd need to verify Windows' behavior here, but recently used lists are shortcuts and will fail if the object no longer exists. Again, IIRC, it
loads in the most recent saved version, not a copy - I know, this is client/server, but even there, a Windows RU list will go to the server network link to get the existing object, if it's still there.
I think this is what this should do ? know - it - all that I am ;-) ? and maybe some of what I suggest comes under CMS. I like having a changed version come up even when a connection has broken. But Word does this with a message, asking what to do - use the cached version or go to the original.
Besides, that is how CODE behaves. I opened a member for edit in CODE, added a line, saved it, and closed it. Went back to SEU and deleted the empty line. Exited and saved. Back to CODE, opened from RU list, and the member was downlaoded again, including sequence renumbering.
Thanks again
Vern
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.