|
First comment. Everything I've seen in PC mags and elsewhere on the web (we researched it fairly extensively just before buying new PCs since so many only offered XP) said that if you have Win 2000 there is zero point in switching. Tech Republic (I think) did a piece on this. They came up with a couple of situations where you might want to switch, but overall the consensus seemed to be "why give MS more money when you don't need to". My other feeling is that since I change hardware around a lot on my PCs (and I depend on them totally to make my living) - the last thing on earth I want to have to do is to "phone home" to Mother MS to get permission to use something I've paid for just because they suspect me of cheating. Even IBM at their height never got this arrogant. I'm hoping that by the time I need to replace Win 2000 I can move to a Linux (or other) desktop and forget all about MS. As to WDSc - it was only the WDT400 V5R1 that had trouble with XP install. WDSc V4 and the just released V5 are both tested for XP and should install just fine. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.