XAML and WPF -- SYSTEMIDOTNET

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: XAML and WPF
From: Steve Richter <stephenrichter@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:57:01 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/systemidotnet>
List-help: <mailto:systemidotnet-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: ".net use with the System i" <systemidotnet.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:systemidotnet@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/systemidotnet>, <mailto:systemidotnet-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/systemidotnet>, <mailto:systemidotnet-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I think I have decided to switch from windows forms to WPF for my
desktop programming. The Petzold book on WPF is pretty good. One thing
I like about it is that in the first part of the book all the WPF code
presented is in a WinForms style, without XAML. What I am trying to
research now is whether I should use XAML or not. Here is a good
article on XAML: http://kentb.blogspot.com/2008/01/xaml.html

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: XAML and WPF , ibm
Re: XAML and WPF , Walden H. Leverich

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.