Re: JBA ML - AFI : SOP-to-GL - some missing postings

Some additional notes with respect to the responses received :

a) No entry at all has been generated : not even suspense a/c entries.
b) Unfortunately the spools produced by the original AFI batch posing are
now deleted. so I don't know whether the infamous ' Invoice examined but
not used' message was therein.
c) I also thought that there might have been a condition in the journal
that would not pick up that invoice but there aren't. The journal processes
all invoices for that company. In fact when I use the 'afi test invoice
extract', I use the Live journal definition type. And this produces the
correct a/c entries in the report.
d) There was no change in the journal definition at that time. In fact the
invoices just before it were posted in 1 batch. And the invoices just after
it were posted in the next batch.
e) I believe the SLPI0 file  is for interfaces outside of AFI, isn't it.?






"Grinstead, Scott" <SAGrinstead@Rockyboots.com>@midrange.com on 09/10/2001
05:07:35 PM

Please respond to jbausers-l@midrange.com

Sent by:  jbausers-l-admin@midrange.com


To:   "'JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com'" <JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com>
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: JBA ML - AFI : SOP-to-GL - some missing postings


The GL update flag set to a zero indicates to me that there weren't any
active journal conditions in AFI that were met.  There is an error report
(FI something) that is produced that states something like "invoice
examined
but not used".  Is it possible that the invoice in question could be a
combination of order type, customer, etc. that would exclude it?
_______________________________________________
This is the GEAC/JBA System 21 Users (JBAUSERS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/jbausers-l
or email: JBAUSERS-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/jbausers-l.