× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: program OE303 (additional overrides)
  • From: "James Martin" <J.MARTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 15:27:30 -0500

Greg,
    Thanks for the tip
        Jim
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: program OE303 (additional overrides)

James
 
Welcome to the list.
 
As to the last question you asked, I believe source code is crucial. I urge you to look in the archive for this list. There was a lengthy discussion back in July regarding the source code issue.
 
Here is the link to the archive. http://archive.midrange.com/
 
Greg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 7:48 AM
Subject: program OE303 (additional overrides)

We are at V3.5.1.  On 1/23/97 JBA made PTF OEV3_0907 to the program, which I believe is in error.  Basically, it does this:
 
If WT is not attached, the default for field VACOF1 (VAT country) is taken from COCD05 (customer country code, a mandatory field in A/R custmast maint).  The original version of OE303 used TXCT05 for the default, which is blank if WT is not used  The program logic does not allow entry of a VAT country without also entering a VAT registration id.  If WT is not being used, why populate VAT county in the first place?  Can anyone look in later versions of this program and see if this PTF was removed.  We've done extensive mods to this program to get both header and line level VAT overrides to work, as well as other types of header overrides, none of which worked originally.
 
Also, I am new to GEAC's web site http://customer.system21.com.  Does anyone know if there is a way to view source code within the site?
 
Last question:  We understand that GEAC will no longer deliver JBA source code to new customers, and depending on existing contracts, may stop delivering source to existing customers.  What have you heard?  Does anyone believe that a company using JBA would survive w/o source, given the extent of bugs, lack of documentation, and inadequate support due to high JBA employee turnover?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.