|
Mark, Are you using Explorer or Green on Black (eg Client Access). If you are using Green on Black, the easy answer is to use the Field Minus for negatives rather than Field Plus. This comes down to training and then more training. As the local financials consultant I can say that figures over 10000000 are not uncommon. Explorer uses the GUI convention of highlighting for replacement all characters, and I believe leading negative signs. Good luck Michael "Mike Von Stein" <vonstein@wcoil.com> on 30/07/2000 10:29:15 Please respond to JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com To: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com cc: (bcc: Michael Berman/JBA International/AU) Subject Annoying user interface issues: 100- and : 10000000 current setting: 100- desired setting: -100 Is there any kind of preference setting that controls the way negative #'s are handled? We have found that we need to put the negative sign *behind* the number or it gets stripped and actually made *positive!* (In our geographic area, in front of the number is the convention.) It still shows you on the prompt that the "-" has been stripped, but many users are used to hitting enter 2X fast and never see it. Also, is there any way to prevent users who do not hit field-exit from entering astronomical quantities. Periodically we see scrap posted at "10000000" or some rediculous quantity because of someone's typo when they meant to have entered "1". I suspect there's not, but I guess I can always hope... :) Thanks, Mike Von Stein
current setting: 100-
desired setting: -100
Is there any kind of preference setting that controls the way
negative #'s are handled? We have found that we need to put the
negative sign *behind* the number or it gets stripped and actually made
*positive!* (In our geographic area, in front of the number is the
convention.) It still shows you on the prompt that the "-" has been
stripped, but many users are used to hitting enter 2X fast and never see
it.
Also, is there any way to prevent users who do not hit
field-exit from entering astronomical quantities. Periodically we
see scrap posted at "10000000" or some rediculous quantity because of someone's
typo when they meant to have entered "1". I suspect there's not, but I
guess I can always hope... :)
Thanks,
Mike Von Stein
|
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.