|
"mlazarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mlazarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The original poster (Shalom) was suggesting that ...
<snip>
there is a possible security hole.
I agree that this isn't a "hole". I think it comes down to the definition. I.e., is the existence of *ALLOBJ a hole? Of course it isn't. However, if there was no way to prevent access to *ALLOBJ, then a hole would exist. In this case, there is a set of actions that can take place that cause inaccurate info to be recorded. It is possible to cause a journal to record that one user created a value, when in fact the value was created by a different user. But because it's possible to prevent that by proper application of known security principles, it isn't a "hole". Nevertheless, this is fairly a novel idea and is well worth being made known to everyone. It clearly demonstrates that proper precautions must be taken. It provides a textbook example of why, for example, debug access to production tasks is a serious issue. The discussion illustrates for everyone who is learning from this list why the related precautionary guidelines exist. Tom Liotta
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.