× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Yes - those are two of the API's that you can use to change current
user.  

jte

--
John Earl | Chief Technology Officer
The PowerTech Group
19426 68th Ave. S
Seattle, WA 98032
(253) 872-7788 ext. 302
john.earl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.powertech.com 
 

 
This email message and any attachments are intended only for the use of
the intended recipients and may contain information that is privileged
and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any
dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you
received this email message in error, please immediately notify the
sender by replying to this email message, or by telephone, and delete
the message from your email system.
--

> -----Original Message-----
> From: security400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:security400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dan
> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 11:46 AM
> To: Security Administration on the AS400 / iSeries
> Subject: Re: [Security400] Program object's USRPRF(*USER
> vs. *OWNER) effectonauthorities required to run certain
> things.
> 
> On 11/11/05, John Earl <john.earl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > QUESTION: Do they really mean to imply the _user
> profile_
> > > in effect at the
> > > time the command is being executed, and not the
> signed-on
> > > _user_?
> >
> > They mean the user profile _in_effect_. That means if
> you are using
> > program profile adoption, then it is the combined
> authorities of the
> > Signed on User and the Owner(s) of the adopting
> program(s) being
> > executed.
> >
> > If you are using swapped profile, it is simply the
> authority of the
> > "Current" user.
> 
> 
> In our particular case, either way we are covered.
> 
> But I'm curious about the "swapped profile" comment. Are
> you referring to
> the QSYGETPH and QWTSETP duo? Or something else?
> 
> - Dan
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Security Administration on the AS400 / iSeries
> (Security400) mailing list
> To post a message email: Security400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit:
> http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/security400
> or email: Security400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the
> archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/security400.
> 



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.