×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Charles,

Rather than risk hosing something else on your box by trying to create a
"replacement *PUBLIC profile" or even just trying to hit every object on
your box, it seems to me it would be a lot easier to use an exit program for
the ODBC/JDBC remote transactions.  

There are several exit program security products out there, but only one
that I know of can afford 'pinpoint' accuracy with regard to controlling
access via the exit point without having to modify any existing OS/400
object authorities or user profile groupings.

Contact me offline if you would like more details.

Steven W. Martinson, CISSP, CISM
iSeries Security Consultant  |  NetIQ Corporation

Cell 281.546.9836  |  www.netiq.com 
1233 West Loop South  |  Suite 1800  |  Houston, TX 77027
 

> message: 1
> date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:01:25 -0400
> from: "Wilt, Charles" <CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> subject: [Security400] Prevent User Profile from using public authority

> Is there any way to prevent a user profile from using *PUBLIC authority?

> Here's the scenario, I've got a user profile set up for JDBC use from a
external web server.  All I want this profile do > be able to do is call
stored procedures it is specifically authorized to.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.