Re: [Security400] Allowing Someone to Create User Profiles...

[rob@xxxxxxxxx]

Touche'.  Use of the data queue's does require api's.

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin 




Evan Harris <spanner@xxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: security400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
09/25/2003 02:22 PM
Please respond to
Security Administration on the AS400 / iSeries  <security400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
Security Administration on the AS400 / iSeries <security400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
Re: [Security400] Allowing Someone to Create User Profiles...






Rob

Would the API phobic use data queues ? Would they still used them if they 
looked at the API manual and subsequently discovered that the data queue 
calls were <gasp> API calls ? What about QCAEXEC.

Seems to me that some of the mystery surrounding API's is the way IBM 
provided the documentation

Just for the record I am neither API-phobic nor pointer phobic  :)

Regards
Evan Harris

>Evan, you're right about the group profile.  That part of adopted
>authority doesn't work and a profile swap is in order.  Um, submit a 
batch
>job which runs under QSECOFR and updates a data queue on the submitting
>program that the process is done?  Just another option for the API 
phobic.
>
>Rob Berendt
>--
>"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
>safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
>Benjamin Franklin

_______________________________________________
This is the Security Administration on the AS400 / iSeries (Security400) 
mailing list
To post a message email: Security400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/security400
or email: Security400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/security400.