Re: "Not authorized to command XXXXXXXX" -- SECURITY400

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: [Security400] "Not authorized to command XXXXXXXX"
From: "John Earl" <johnearl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:34:35 -0700
List-Archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/security400/>
List-Help: <mailto:security400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-Id: Security Administration on the AS400 / iSeries <security400.midrange.com>
List-Post: <mailto:security400@midrange.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/security400>,<mailto:security400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/security400>,<mailto:security400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: The PowerTech Group

> I used EDTOBJAUT per your advice.  This seems to match what the
security
> reference says.
>
> Why isn't QSECOFR in this list?  Is it because it has *ALLOBJ
special
> authority?

Profile's will *ALLOBJ automatically have *ALL authority to everything
on the system.  No need to grant them authority to an object.  No use
in trying to *EXCLUDE them from an object.

jte

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.