×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Hi all
Thank you for all your clarifications. I'm now using the
for i = 1 to %elem(Elements)
construction. I still think updating the current element via a named index would be great so I added an Idea
https://ideas.ibm.com/ideas/IBMI-I-4154
Kind Regards, Met vriendelijke groet,
Martijn van Breden
lead software architect
On 2024-07-10 10:27 p.m., Scott Klement wrote:
Err, this would run a WHOLE LOT faster than having to do a %LOOKUP on
each element:
for i = 1 to %elem(array);
item = array(i);
endfor;
Not only faster, but more understandable too.
You could also do this:
i = 0;
for-each item in array;
i += 1;
...
endfor;
But I think using the FOR loop is better because it keeps everything
inside the loop.
--
Barbara
--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.