× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On 2024-01-16 1:35 p.m., Hiebert, Chris wrote:
I first started using the code in 2012 and have not seen them move anywhere else since.

But like I said, you don't have to reference them if you don't want to.

From: Jon Paris
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 11:21 AM

Are you sure the "other" indicators are always mapped that way Chris? I was always lead to believe that only the *IN group were guaranteed to be contiguous as they were implicitly an array. Similarly 0A, OB, etc. are contiguous as a group but I've never heard that they follow the standard 99 set.


There's no guarantee that all the *IN indicators are contiguous, but it's unlikely that the additional indicators would move from where they are currently.

Even so, assuming I needed to save and restore the indicators, I would create a procedure to save the indicators in a data structure parameter and another procedure to restore the indicators from the data structure parameter, referencing the *IN indicators by their ordinary RPG names.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.