×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Am 26.08.2021 um 00:37 schrieb Barbara Morris <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>:

And I wouldn't actually recommend sticking a cycle module in a service program
or even as a submodule in a program. I'm not sure I'd even actively recommend using a cycle module as the main module for a *PGM, although I wouldn't particularly recommend against it either.

So if I read a bit between the lines, you/IBM don’t recommend the usage of cycle main procedures at all.

But there are some significant differences between cycle mains and linear mains - e.g. when unhandled exceptions occur. Therefore we still use cycle mains for our main programs, even if we do not like it a lot.

Is there any way, or plan, to have linear main procedures behave the same way as cycle main procedures in the case of unhandled exceptions?

Regards,
Daniel



This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.