Re: Fields too large for a Subprocedure - CWX9001

yea, there is a problem. You are 32MB of static storage. Not good.

One solution I could think of is to use a RTNPARM. That way the operating
system is passing a pointer to storage you have allocated in the caller.

How big is what Scott returning? It is it 16MB?



On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:29 AM Jack Prucha <Jack.Prucha@xxxxxxx> wrote:

I made some enhancements to a running but very new program. Changed a
subroutine into a subprocedure and reworked the SQL select.

Started getting all sorts of misleading error messages.

The subroutine was using Scott's HTTP subroutine to call a PUT to a URL.
There's a send string and a result string each varchar of 16000000. I put
the call and the fields used by the call inside the subprocedure. Started
getting this error:

Msg id Sv Message text
*CWX9001 40 An error occurred during translation.
Cause . . . . . : An irrecoverable error has occurred
during
translation. The reason code is 0001. See the previous
messages listed in the joblog.
Recovery . . . : This error indicates that an internal
compiler error has occurred. Contact your service
representative.

This just a little bit more helpful message was in the joblog:

Message ID . . . . . . : MCH4216 Severity . . . . . . . : 40
Message type . . . . . : Escape
Date sent . . . . . . : 08/17/20 Time sent . . . . . . :
13:21:30

Message . . . . : Automatic storage for procedure exceeds maximum.
Cause . . . . . : The object was not created because an internal system
limit was reached. Not enough automatic storage was available to
allocate a
data object within a procedure.
Recovery . . . : Reduce the number or size of automatic data objects
within
the procedure.
Technical description . . . . . . . . : The current offset in automatic
storage of the next available byte is 16051152 bytes and the maximum
offset
is 16776703 bytes. The number of bytes required to allocate the data
object
is 16000004. The dictionary index for the data object is 513, the
dictionary entry is
X'080400010000022A0000000000F4240400000024000000007000800080010000', and
the


After a lot of trial and error I moved the definition of these fields back
outside of the new subprocedure and made them global to the program.

Dcl-s HTTPResponse VarChar(16000000);
Dcl-s JSONResponse VarChar(16000000);

Now, that part of the program is happy (the SQL is still needing
attention).

Is this just a current size limit inside subprocedures or is there a
setting? I tried the *Terrabyte setting while trying to figure this out
and that caused many other errors.

It compiles fine now but putting fields outside of the subprocedure seems
counter-productive.

BTW - 7.3

TIA
Jack



[CFNC]

This email, including any documents, files, or previous email messages
attached to it, has been sent from an email account of College Foundation
Inc., (CFI) and may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally
privileged information belonging to CFI. If you are not the intended
recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email or its
attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in
error, please immediately notify the sender by email and destroy the
original email and any attachments.
--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com