|
On Jun 1, 2020, at 1:29 PM, Barbara Morris <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2020-06-01 8:49 a.m., Joe Pluta wrote:
Thank you again, Barbara. And to expand on this, just to make sure I don't mess it up, with our policy of applying PTFs on development first and then on production after a shakeout period, the sequence would go something like this:
1. Apply PTFs to development
2. ADDENVVAR QIBM_RPG_DISABLE_TIMESTAMP_MICROSEC VALUE('Y') LEVEL(*SYS) on development
3. (normal PTF shakeout period)
4. Apply PTFs to production
5. RMVENVVAR QIBM_RPG_DISABLE_TIMESTAMP_MICROSEC LEVEL(*SYS) on development
Yep, that looks right.
--
Barbara
--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
