Re: regexec() Standards Compliance

I didn't know about regex101, but I like it as well.  The two sites are very similar, just with slightly different features.

Being as much of a novice as I am, I find that https://regexr.com/ is a little more help-oriented.  I think https://regex101.com/ is a little better suited for people with more knowledge.  Especially the unit tests part - that is very cool.


On 3/26/2020 10:43 AM, Niels Liisberg wrote:

Hey Joe

wow - https://regexr.com/ is cool too. However, I still prefer
https://regex101.com/

The more tools in the box the better !! Thanx




On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:03 PM Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Not quite on-topic, but I found this site very helpful when I was
working on some Regex: https://regexr.com/. In particular, I like how
it broke down the matching and allowed you to click on a particular
match and get more information on that token.


On 3/26/2020 3:26 AM, Niels Liisberg wrote:

Hey Javier,

I found that the regex C library on IBM i is compatible with PCRE - used

in

Pearl, PHP and SQL REGEXP_REPALCE etc.

so when you test your regex, you can use https://regex101.com/ and

select

PCRE as flavor.

--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com