|
If the code is not making any procedure calls, it makes little sense.
May just as well use CRTBNDRPG, (instead of CRTRPGMOD + CRTPGM). The
*MODULE serves no purpose other than take up space and complicate object
management in this situation.
However, if procedure calls ARE being used, (e.g. in a *SRVPGM or maybe
bindable API's) then it makes perfect sense. (Even then, CRTBNDRPG
enables procedure calls through *BNDDIR.)
Maybe a shop-standard that's a little too stringent? Maybe the change
control tool dictates this approach? Maybe there's more to this tale
than meets the eye?
HTH,
Brian.
On 01/10/2019 18:20, tim.feldmeier wrote:
I have not seen many companies binding modules, but, one strange thingI've seen....they make a module , and a *PGM the same name for every
program. why?What is the sense of binding only one module?Sent from my
Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.