Re: ILE Binding Question -- RPG400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: ILE Binding Question
From: Sam_L <lennon_s_j@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:01:15 -0400
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on IBM i <rpg400-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Are you sure they are binding only one module? Could they be binding in some standard routine that are common to all executables?

Otherwise it seems to make little sense.

Sam

On 10/1/2019 1:20 PM, tim.feldmeier wrote:

I have not seen many companies binding modules, but, one strange thing I've seen....they make a module , and a *PGM the same name for every program. why?What is the sense of binding only one module?Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.