× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



It almost certainly performs better - but whether it is a significant enough difference to measure is another matter.

Simply put, when you do any I/O operation RPG moves each field from/to the buffer. If you have a record with 1,000 fields then moving 3 vs 1,000 may be noticeable. I moving only 3 out of 6 you'll not see any measurable difference.

But as others have said that is NOT the reason to use it. Safety and documentation are the real reasons.


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

On Jun 13, 2019, at 5:24 PM, Vinay Gavankar <vinaygav@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks everyone. The advantages of partial updates are understood, but
someone claimed that it gives a better performance, hence I just wanted to
either verify or debunk that statement.

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 2:53 PM Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Performance isn't the real issue, imho. Its more about updating &
record locks. If someone else is in there changing f5 through f100
while your user is updating f1 through f4 then that other user is going
to be scratching her/his head as to why update don't work. And the
other way around, too.

On 6/13/2019 8:18 AM, Vinay Gavankar wrote:
Hi,

If I have a table with 100 fields, when updating only 4 fields, is there
any performance advantage of using

update rcdfmt %fields(f1, f2, f3, f4);
vs.
update rcdfmt;

Is the advantage (or absence) documented anywhere (need to show my
bosses)

Thanks
Vinay
--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com

--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.