Re: Reg: JSON Parsing Error when using Scott Klement's YAJL Parser

Hi Pete,

In this case again i am receiving the same error but the data was populated
into the Data structure successful. Since we have the On-Error Subroutine
to catch any error, i can see the Data Structure value got populated.

But if i want to Parse the playerPin details then i will get error and the
data structure will not be populated correct? Any idea how to overcome this
one?

Regards,
Surender K
+1 7022091188

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 1:00 PM Pete Helgren <pete@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I can't quite tell what the complaint is about except it referenced a
pointer that wasn't set. I would be curious to know that if you
reversed the JSON your scenario #2 to be this:

{
"metadata":{
"propertyId":"E4",
"suren":"suren",
"clientId":"ATRIENTKIOSK",
"transDateTime":"2017-11-30T18:25:08Z",
"transStation":"DEVICE1",
"transEmployee":"MASTR"
},
"data":{
"playerProfile":{
"title":"Mr",
"firstName":"John",
"lastName":"Smith"
},
"playerPin":{
"pinNumber":"7924"
}
}
}

if you would get the same error. I wouldn't think that YAJL would be
"positional" at all, it is just looking for "playerProfile" within the
"data" object. But it might give you a clue as to what is going on. Scott
monitors this list. He may weigh in with a better explanation and
understanding of the error.

Pete Helgren
www.petesworkshop.com
GIAC Secure Software Programmer-Java
Twitter - Sys_i_Geek IBM_i_Geek

On 6/11/2019 11:15 AM, Suren K wrote:

Hi Pete,

Thanks for replying and helping me out.

The Error message i got is as below
4>> CALL SKANTHAS/DUMMY2
Pointer not set for location referenced.
Application error. MCH3601 unmonitored by QRNXUTIL at statement
0000000031, instruction X'0000'.
Application error. MCH3601 unmonitored by QRNXUTIL at statement
0000000031, instruction X'0000'.
Unmonitored exception at line 423
Replacement text of message CEE9901 in QCEEMSG in QSYS not valid for
format specified.
? *N

Regards,
Surender K


On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:57 AM Pete Helgren <pete@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It probably isn't important but you characterized your scenario #2 as
adding another array to the document. You haven't added to an array,
you added a second object to the "data" object. It's just semantics,
but it alters the view of the JSON a bit.

I haven't worked with YAJL all that much but within the object you have
two objects, metadata and data and within the data object in your second
scenario, you have two objects, playerPin and playerProfile. I would
guess that adding a second object shouldn't affect the prior reference:

Scenario 1

data.playerProfile

Scenario 2

data.playerPin

data.playerProfile

Maybe giving us the error message would help us track down the

solution....

Pete Helgren
www.petesworkshop.com
GIAC Secure Software Programmer-Java
Twitter - Sys_i_Geek IBM_i_Geek

Pete Helgren
www.petesworkshop.com
GIAC Secure Software Programmer-Java
Twitter - Sys_i_Geek IBM_i_Geek

On 6/10/2019 9:16 PM, Suren K wrote:

--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com