On Feb 22, 2019, at 11:12 PM, John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:30 PM Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If it can be handled by SQL and XML-SAX there's no reason it can't be handled by XML-INTO - and it requires a lot less logic than XM:L-SAX.
There *is* a potential reason, and I already discussed it (actually, I
led with it): SAX (I don't know specifically about XML-SAX, but in
principle, any SAX solution) only needs to operate on a small part of
the document at any given time, and thus requires much less memory for
very large files. If not the whole point of SAX, it's at least one
very important point.
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com