The difference is intentional ...
When you code the form you show below, that generates the equivalent of a "case" statement in Pascal, or a "switch" in C ... or a FORTRAN computed GOTO ... whereas, if you code the equivalent with:
if ... elseif ... elseif ... ... else endif
that will always generate that many "tests"... and branches ...
A computed goto usually uses a "branch table" so it has an array of addresses or labels, and does a "look-up" or index operation into that array to get the address of where to go, so it is generally much faster than having to perform all of those tests, especially if there are hundreds of "cases"...
However, if you code something like:
select when a = b;
... when c = d; ...
... otherwise; ...
this format will also generate multiple tests and branches, just like the " if-elseif-elseif-else-endif " scenario.
Hope that helps,
Mark S. Waterbury
On Friday, January 25, 2019, 4:01:55 PM EST, Mark Murphy <jmarkmurphy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does anyone else find the redundancy between the select block and the
if-elseif-else block a little disconcerting? Seems to me that there should
be a clear distinction between the two. There never can be at this point,
so I tend to use a relatively inconsistent mix of the two in my code based
on what mood I am in. But the select syntax has a potentially game changing
This syntax reduces redundancy in a significant amount of code, by
reducing the need to retype code variable names over and over again.
Wouldn't it be nice?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact