On Aug 23, 2018, at 11:58 AM, gio.cot <gio.cot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
strings. You basically call the API for each entry you want to output.Both powerExt and XMLi allow for an API approach to building the XML
(http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg248185.htmlIn Chapter 5 of the RPG Modernization Redbook
<http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg248185.html>) I wrote an example of
using each of these options - including CGIDEV2. So if you >>look at that
you'll get a very direct comparison between the CGIDEV2 approach you are
familiar with and the other two options you are considering.
question of personal preference. Personally (sorry Henrik) I have a slightpowerext and XMLi are very similar in approach - it is mostly just a
preference for XMLi mostly because I find its approach to specifying
attributes to be more obvious than the way it >>is done in powerExt.
can i create a skeleton RPG sourcecode from Xml with XMLi, like
PXXMLRPGCM of PowerEXT ??
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD