|
We raised a number of potential production concerns re RCAC in this 2014 blog post:
http://ibmsystemsmag.com/blogs/idevelop/archive/rcac-two-steps-forward-one-back/ <http://ibmsystemsmag.com/blogs/idevelop/archive/rcac-two-steps-forward-one-back/>
Subsequently we revisited the issue later that same year based on a comment by Kent Milligan (which weirdly no longer appears on the blog):
http://ibmsystemsmag.com/blogs/idevelop/archive/who-was-that-masked-man--or-that-masked-value-/ <http://ibmsystemsmag.com/blogs/idevelop/archive/who-was-that-masked-man--or-that-masked-value-/>
That second blog referenced the article that Kent Milligan wrote on the way that IBM suggest the issues be handled. That article is here:
http://ibmsystemsmag.com/blogs/idevelop/archive/rcac-two-steps-forward-one-back/ <http://ibmsystemsmag.com/blogs/idevelop/archive/rcac-two-steps-forward-one-back/>
Don't know if you have seen those pieces. We have not revisited the topic since moving to V7.3 but I'm not aware of any changes since V7.2.
Jon Paris
www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
