Re: RPG & Teraspace Storage Model -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: RPG & Teraspace Storage Model
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:11:58 -0700
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "RPG programming on the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Alan Campin <alan0307d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I did 1 million loops writing 4 lines. Result was a file of 93MB.

Results.

In memory only. 12.257 seconds
In IFS only 19.830 seconds
IFS Temp 19.390 seconds

Does the in-memory summary include a million calls to %alloc() or
%realloc() within the loop?

It would be interesting to see the performance of *USRSPC output.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: RPG & Teraspace Storage Model , Alan Campin
Re: RPG & Teraspace Storage Model , Jon Paris

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.