On Nov 8, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Dan <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
PGMA has an *entry plist with 2 parameters, all fixed C-specs.
PGMB calls PGMA with 3 parameters in the call.
Both programs are RPGLE.
In my testing, there were no apparent errors.
Is there a concern that the data passed in the 3rd parameter may corrupt
memory in PGMA?
This is somewhat an academic question. PGMA currently has two *entry parms
defined. Currently, in development, it is being modified to add a third
parameter. (FWIW, it will be optional because many programs will continue
to call the program with only two parameters. %PARMS is used to determine
the number of parms passed.) There is a web app that calls PGMA with two
parameters currently, but is being modified to call it with three
Since web app deployment and Power i app deployment are on different
schedules, the web app may be deployed before the Power i app. Hence my
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD