×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Looking at an old program that using GOTO...I'd like to get rid of it.
In this case, it's a relatively simple usage
//mainline part1
if something goto @end
//mainline part2
if somethingelse goto @end
//mainline part 3
...
TAG @END
eval parm12 = *IN12;
return;
I see two options
1) dou loop
2) add an end_program subroutine
---Option 1---
dou *on = *on; //run once
//mainline part1
if something leave
//mainline part2
if somethingelse leave
//mainline part 3
enddo;
eval parm12 = *IN12;
return;
---Option 2---
//mainline part1
if something exsr @END_PROGRAM
//mainline part2
if somethingelse exsr @END_PROGRAM
//mainline part 3
...
exsr @END_PROGRAM
//shouldn't get here, but to be safe
return;
begsr @END_PROGRAM;
eval parm12 = *IN12;
return;
endsr;
Advantages to option 2 as I see them...
- works even if GOTO exists in a loop in the mainline
- works if GOTO is in an subroutine
note that the "eval parm12 = *IN12" line is due to refactoring a *ENTRY
PLIST into a PR/PI. *IN12 was specified as the factor 2 on the PARM
op-code for parm12. So I can't just change GOTO @END to RETURN.
Thoughts / comments on either of the above options?
Any additional tips or techniques?
Thanks!
Charles
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.