×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
How about all related source in one source file? I like having related
stuff together, in one place, during the development cycle.
I have never understood the advantage of separating source by type.
That, to me, is akin to having a library for all name & address records,
whether A/R, A/P, P/R, or Sales. Then another library for all files
dealing with quantities, and another for all transaction histories, and
so on.
The idea of non-unique names frankly terrifies me. One more way to mess
everything up. :)
On 9/12/2017 9:30 PM, Buck Calabro wrote:
Interesting. I've always felt a little saddened by those who prefer
to keep all the source in one source file. That decision mandates
allocating at least one of the ten precious characters to designate
the source type.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
