|
Dan,--
While you are at it, how about the CAS* op-codes.
Those are even *more* obscure.
:)
Jeff Young
Sr. Programmer Analyst
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Dan <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What are the chances we could get IBM / Barbara to get the compiler topuke
on any of the CAB* opcodes? At a minimum, the compiler should post athe
message requiring a reply to the question, "How many years before you
retire?" and, if the response is greater than 1, tell the user to drop
bloody CAB* opcodes and try again.or
Perhaps less complex is to just update SEU one last time that flags any
CAB* opcode as a syntax error. Cuz you damn well know they're not using
RDi!
Yes, there are other opcodes, including cousin GOTO (so flag that as a
syntax error as well), but CAB* opcodes are so obscure, I spend a minute
two just trying to understand what is trying to be accomplished.
Is it 5:00 yet?
<Rant /done>
- Dan
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.