× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Vern,

I'd be shocked if XMLTABLE, which uses a SET based approach, doesn't
perform faster. I can't give you intelligent comparison information,
because XMLTABLE is the ONLY way I've ever parsed XML, and likely the ONLY
way I'll parse it in the future.

Mike

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Hi Mike

Thanks, this is encouraging - and others related to the project like what
I showed in one example.

So one question has been, will it perform in less time - I suspect it well
- overall there are around 13 tables that will be populated using data from
the XML. Currently, when there is a parsing error, that goes to someone to
fix manually.

The SQL stuff has automagically put an x'3F' where the "evil woes" reside.
Nice - no manual effort needed at all.

As I said to one of the other developers, "Do I have to work hard to
convince you that no errors is a good thing?" He laughed heartily!

Cheers
Vern



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.