|
My argument would build on yours, Buck. In my opinion, design constraints
of the 80s, 90s, and 00s required certain frameworks. Updating program by
program maintains that archaic framework and thus shops pay the price to
get new code but are stuck with design parameters that can hamstring the
improvements. Going back later and updating the framework doesn't solve
the problem.
Its all a dance.
On 4/30/2017 2:04 PM, Buck Calabro wrote:
I am not arguing that I need to rewrite every bit of code I come
across. I'm arguing that CC..CC..B is used too often, and that
analysing that code/before/ copying it happens even less. That's how
so many programs became fragile monoliths. In my opinion.
--buck
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.