× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Doesn’t help.

XML-SAX will break out the components (element name and element data) just
the same as XML-INTO does. Only difference is it does it one field at a
time. Not helpful for the OP.

I can think of a risky non-guaranteed strategy where XML-SAX might help -
but it relies on the compiler internals remaining consistent and I
certainly wouldn’t want to base production code on it - a one-time routine
maybe.



​Jon,

I'll admit to not having used XML-SAX...

However, it would seem to me that it'd be easier to build a string
containing a subset of the XML from within the XML-SAX handler.

At least then you don't have to worry about the structure of the subset
data.

Though the handler might be a bit complex...since you'd have to rebuild the
string one event / data at a time.

Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.