Re: Interactive screen logic, Message subfiles, and the program stack

Right. That is why mine works and your did not. I have the exfmt in the the
main control loop and all functions that get called are from the main
procedure which is on the call stack. Just move the exfmt into the main
control loop and everything will work. Message queue has to exist to send
to it.
On Apr 26, 2015 11:15 AM, "Tools/400" <thomas.raddatz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Bob,

It is not the procedure that includes the EXFMT that you must use for
sending your messages to, because the Display() procedure is not on the
call stack when you are in ValidInput() or FunctionKeyPressed(). You need
to use a procedure, that is always on the call stack.

For your example you could use the procedure that controls the program flow
and which calls Display(), ValidInput() and FunctionKeyPressed().

For example, if the name of your main procedure is 'main', then set SLPGMQ
on the message subfile to 'main' and send your messages to procedure main
like this:

QMHSNDPM(msgId: qMsgFName: msgData: %len(msgData): msgType
: 'main': 0: msgKey: errorCode)

I am not sure what happens if you have multiple 'main' procedures on the
call stack.

But you could make your main procedure unique like this:

P main pr extproc('ModuleName_main')

Then use QMHSNDPM like this:

QMHSNDPM(msgId: qMsgFName: msgData: %len(msgData): msgType
: 'ModuleName_main': 0: msgKey: errorCode)

That works as long as you do not bind your module to multiple programs.

Thomas.


Am 24.04.2015 um 22:44 schrieb Bob Cagle:

Alan

I did try that - using the procedure name that includes the Exfmt, but I

still got that 'call stack entry can't be found' error and no messages
displayed.

Thanks

Bob Cagle
IT Manager
Lynk, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: RPG400-L [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces-Zwy7GipZuJhWk0Htik3J/

w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Campin

Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 2:36 PM
To: RPG programming on the IBM i / System
Subject: Re: Interactive screen logic, Message subfiles, and the program

stack

Bob I would go back to my code. Note my code for displaying subfiles

messages. The service program XVMSGS handles it correctly. You have to give
it the program name, module name and the main procedure. Whatever procedure
has the exfmt would be the procedure name.

On Apr 24, 2015 12:15 PM, "Bob Cagle" <bcagle-1/Z/dJ/

1MFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It seems this subject has been discussed ad-nauseam, but yes, this

again:

I recently converted my messaging routines to service programs and
switched to using sub-procedures vs subroutines and was having trouble
getting the everything to work.

With the help of older posts here on the list and some others examples
(thanks Alan Campin and your Trigger Mediator code), I finally got
everything working.

Now I'm just trying to understand something, hope I explain this well
enough:

I have a module with a 'ProcessScreen' procedure that is just
controlling the flow and calls subprocedures for everything, like so:


Dcl-proc ProcessScreen;

Init();

DOU Key = F3:
Display();
IF Not FunctionKeyPressed();

IF ValidInput();
Process();
ENDIF;
ENDIF;
ENDDO;

End-proc;


Obviously, the screen logic is buried in the Display() subprocedure:

Dcl-proc Display;
Write MSGCTL01;
Exfmt SC01;
MSG_Clear( Procedure:Module:Program ); End-proc;


Error messages are thrown in both the FunctionKeyPressed and ValidInput
subprocedures.

I manually set the Procedure variable to be 'ProcessScreen' and pull the
module and program names from the program status data structure. And I

set

the SLPGMQ on the message subfile to '*'.

What I have found with this structure is that even though the messages
show in the joblog, they will not display in the message subfile.

But when I get rid of the Display() subprocedure and move the display
logic to ProcessScreen, voila, it works.

Pretty sure this has to do with the program stack. How would I make the
message subfile work with the display logic in a 'sub' subprocedure? I

did

try changing the procedure variable to 'Display', but received the 'call
stack entry not found' error.

So what's the answer here - am I just stuck with the having the display
logic in the top-level procedure? Not that it's that big a deal, but

it's

annoying not being able to figure this out.

Thanks

Bob Cagle
IT Manager
Lynk, Inc.

--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.