×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
... the performance discussion is ridiculous.
- Ted Holts "Benchmark" is from 2007 recent systms are lots faster!!!
- The main results where:
passing 64 Byte he didn't get any diffrence, even for 7.500.000 call
operations
passing 64 KB call by reference was at 1 sec for 500.000 calls and call by
value was at 22 sec, but his "Benchmark" didn't do anything else. 500.000
calls, passing 64 kB, the called procedure has to do work for 32 GB of data
(or it doesn't need the data?) and for this amount of data the time for the
call operation could be neglected!!!
In the real world 500 calls within a transaction are quite a lot and 500
calls by value would make some milliseconds on the not named hardware of the
"Benchmark". Running on recent systems one single database operation would
take more time than hundreds of call by value, and normally parameters with
64 kB should be rather seldom for an apropriate design.
D*B
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This thread ...
Re: Varying fields as parameters on procedure calls., (continued)
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
