× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. November 2014

Re: Doing something wrong with a reade and Qualified DS

On 11/17/2014 11:38 AM, RPGLIST wrote:
This is so simple but I'm running into a problem that I for the life of me
can't see.

I have a procedure where I'm reading through a file by doing a setll and
then a reade, same as I've done thousands of times, but this time it says
I've found the record when I've verified its not there...

Here is the relevant code:

Setll (xCmlPro:xCmlTrl) LdPrp;
Reade (xCmlPro:xCmlTrl) LdPrp LdPrpDs;
Dow not %Eof(LdPrp);
... - It executes this everytime even when we don't find a record.
Reade (xCmlPro:xCmlTrl) LdPrp LdPrpDs;
Enddo;
...

Is there something different about doing this in a procedure with a data
structure that I'm missing?

Not that I've encountered. If I were to run across this, I'd put a
DUMP(A) right after the DOW (and then SETON LR and LEAVE). The dump
will show you exactly what was read and then you can compare it to what
is in the file.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.