|
<Buck>
I did not see a getter in
doSomething() which is probably where my brain got stuck.
</Buck>
In java you would make C1Rec private and provide a getC1Reck and
setC1Rec with package or even protected scope to enable use of
inheritance. As RPG doesn't have inheritance I don't see any need for a
getter and setter (inside the module each procedure has access anyway).
If you are using binder language for providing an intermediate scope of
visability of variables (it's abuse to use binder language for avoiding
rebinds!!!) you could provide setters and getters, export them, but
don't take them to the export list - this way all modules bind by copy
would have access to the setters and getters, but not to the vars and
other components binding the modules by reference (via SRVPGM) wouldn't
have access, neither to the vars, nor to the setters and getters (a
little bit similar to scope package/protected).
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.