× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




Joep,

Are you implying that the compiler DOES accept '*' as a replacement
for '*OMIT'?

Yes, that is right and in fact it was an undocument feature in my terms.
Now it is called a defect.

apparently flags it as illegal (don't know about SEU, but I would
expect the same behaviour), the priority could be extremely low :-)

SEU "loves" the asterix as well as I do. It is only RDi which is not happy
with it.

Regards,

Thomas.

rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb am 05.07.2013 11:58:02:

Von: joep.beckeringh@xxxxxxxxxx
An: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
Datum: 05.07.2013 11:58
Betreff: Re: How do you pass an omitted parameter to a procedure?
Gesendet von: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Thomas,

Are you implying that the compiler DOES accept '*' as a replacement
for '*OMIT'?

If so, and it is an undocumented feature (I have never seen anything
in the documentation about it), I think it it is reasonable to
expect that the compiler be changed. But given the fact that RDI
apparently flags it as illegal (don't know about SEU, but I would
expect the same behaviour), the priority could be extremely low :-)

Joep Beckeringh

Op 4 jul. 2013, om 12:15 heeft thomas.raddatz@xxxxxx het volgende
geschreven:


This is a survey that I started as a result of an APAR that I opened
at
IBM. The actual problem I have is that RDI 9.0 issues a warning for
the
following statements and therefore does not automatically refresh the
"Outline" view.

sendMessage(*: THIS); // - unexpected token(s) ignored
sendMessage('Hello': *); // - unexpected token(s) ignored
sendMessage(*); // cannot detect whether or not it is
// a procedure call or an indexed array
sendMessage(); // legal statement

Now IBM says that the compiler causes the problem, because actually it

should not accept the '*' as a replacement for '*omit'. Finally they
asked
me whether or not I want to open an APAR to fix the compiler. Since
changing the compiler would cause a lot of work for us I am not sure
what
to do and I like to know whether or not you were affected when IBM
changed
the compiler.

Please select:

[ ] Not affected, let IBM change the compiler

or

[ ] STOP, never change the compiler

Feel free to add additional comments.

Thank you.

Thomas.
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)
(RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.



--
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This email is confidential, may be legally privileged, and is for the
intended recipient only. Access, disclosure, copying, distribution, or
reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited and may be a criminal
offence. Please delete if obtained in error and email confirmation to the sender.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.