×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 04 Jul 2013 05:15, thomas.raddatz@xxxxxx wrote:
<<SNIP>> they asked me whether or not I want to open an APAR to fix
the compiler. <<SNIP>>
IMO, FWiW: Have them open an APAR irrespective of a fix or lack
thereof. Without an APAR, there would be no record\documentation that
the situation exists [and was already detected]. There would be no
publicly posted document of what instead would likely be merely their
private reply to you. When an APAR is opened, there will necessarily be
a publicly documented issue and the outcome; even if only to have that
APAR document that the situation is a "permanent restriction",
suggesting that there is no intention by IBM to change anything.
Without the APAR, there would be effectively nothing for anyone to refer
to in the future, if someone else encounters and reports the same issue.
But having been publicly documented previously in an APAR, both the
user and IBM would be able to refer to the past APAR to understand what
was the previous decision by IBM in response to that situation.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
