× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



If you talking about performance of CALL vs CALLP both making a program
there should be no difference at all. CALLP is just interpreted by the
compiler to generate CALL or CALLB code based on what you are calling.

Having said that, you should not be doing either one. CALL, CALLB and CALLP
are all obsolete. What you should be doing is prototyping the program
calls.

d CreateBFile...
d pr ExtPgm('ABCPGM')
d PR_CustomerNumber...
d 8a Const
d PR_Amount...
d 7p 2 Const
/Free

CreateBFile('A0001':
12.50 )

/End-Free

And, of course, if we push it up to the next level, if we are building new
code we shouldn't be doing program calls. We should be encapsulating our
business logic in service programs and making procedure calls.



On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:27 PM, RPGLIST <rpglist@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

My apologies Alan, I should have said CALLP, I knew what I was trying to
say :) I just didn't make it real clear and I appreciate your picking up
on that! Next homebrew beer is yours :)


Assuming I am understanding you, a CALL is not a procedure call, it is a
program call.

Making a procedure call is thousands of times faster than making a
program
call whether that procedure is in a program or in a service program.

Program calls have gotten faster but they are still very slow compared to
procedure call.


On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:13 PM, RPGLIST <rpglist@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I was recently reading that a static procedure call is faster than a
typical program CALL.

I know that with procedures you can pass more data (Parms if you will)
than you can with a typcial program CALL, but are locally or externally
defined procedures really that faster than program CALLS?



--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.


--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.




--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.